Capture the data. Release the goodwill.

There are many things in life that can ruin the mood. Caterpillars in the salad. Wasps in the bedroom. Spotify ads in the middle of my Sounds of Nature playlist.
But nothing dampens my enthusiasm while I’m browsing the web quite as drastically as the dreaded data capture form. It just changes the mood completely.
I refer to the kind of situation where you find a link to an interesting-sounding article, but you are not allowed to see it until you have told them your age, sex and inside leg measurement. It says to me: we were having so much fun, sharing information in a nice friendly way, and then suddenly you had to drop this on me. It’s like a bucket of cold water. So why do so many B2B marketers do it? Here are some of the reasons why they do - and why they shouldn’t.
It shows distrust
Every B2B brand wants to inspire trust in their customers. They want people to be able to rely on them for quality of service, excellent prices, or whatever it is that separates them from their competition. So is it not reasonable to expect those brands to trust their customers? By inserting a data capture form, you are insisting on some kind of insurance because you don’t trust them to stick around. Since when do we demand that kind of commitment from a first date? If you expect them to run for a mile just as soon as they’ve finished reading your precious article, it can’t be a very good article. So you’re clearly not showing that much faith in yourself either.
It is old-fashioned
Now don’t get me wrong. We should use methods because of effectiveness, not fashion. But the data capture screen is so turn of the century. These days, if you embrace wholeheartedly the principles of social media or even if you simply recognise that buyer behaviour has changed a little since 1992, you’ve got to be sympathetic to how buyers use the web. Data capture forms belong in the same Room 101 as the dial-up modems, wet proofs and the Spice Girls.
It’s about quantity over quality.
The big misconception is that data capture forms give you lots of prospects. They don’t. In my experience, you will end up with fewer prospects than you would have had without them. A former client of ours, who shall of course remain nameless, insisted on using data capture at every turn. And completions were extremely low because the very presence of the form says “a salesperson will call you”. If you are pretty confident that the prospect will be delighted at this prospect, this is fine. But the truth is that most of them won’t want that. So you are not actually gathering prospects, but driving them into the arms of your competitors.
No it’s not. It’s about quality over quantity
You might reasonably assume from the point above that data capture forms might at least give you high-quality leads. Surely the very process of filling in the form will filter out all but the very keenest prospects? Sadly it doesn’t look like this is true either.
The general nature of most free content on the web (or at least the fact that most information does not relate to a specific point in the buying cycle) says that data capture respondents (data hostages??) have a very high chance of not being ready to buy. They might be interested in your offering and suitably impressed at the points made in your article. But if they are not ready to buy, you run the risk of spoiling it all by filing their names in the “hot prospect” section of your database.
A little balance
Despite this general rant in this blog, I don’t mean to say that generating leads is not an important part of business. Of course it is. Whether you buy a list, or acquire names by your own activities, these leads are the lifeblood of your sales operation. But be sure not to confuse inbound and outbound marketing; let them do what they do best with muddling the two together in an unholy and inconsistent mess. To recap:
Inbound marketing is about offering information, advice, attention and thought to prove that you know what you’re talking about and that you care about your customers. This will ultimately get you onto their shortlist when selecting suppliers.
Outbound marketing is when you offer your product as a solution. Quite different, but nonetheless worthy. And it’s outbound marketing where your buyers will sign up, so that’s where you do your data capture.
So it is not the form itself that offends, but its lazy deployment as a default mechanism. If your business is selling information - research papers, for example - it has to be protected. That’s just normal business, and copyright laws are there to govern the distribution of that material.
But if, like most of us these days, you are creating content that you think is interesting to your target audience, make it freely available. Without charge. Without conditions. Without intrusive telemarketing. Remove every obstacle and allow that information to spread around the world, carrying with it your good name, and letting the good people of your target audience know that you are experts in your area.
This is of course just my opinion. You may disagree, and you will find a comment form below for precisely that purpose. Just fill in your name, email address…



9 Comments
Mark William Schaefer
John, insightful and enjoyable read.
My own experience with data capture parallels the points you make here, but I am also at a loss to name a meaningful alternative metric -- how do we capture actionable leads, especially for the little guys who can't produce the volume of content that will insure the high exposure we hope will provide the social media pay-off?
Case in point: One of my clients offered a free whitepaper on his site. Lots of downloads, but no chance to follow-up because of the anonymity of the process.
We switched to data collection. Less downloads, but at least we had a place to go for some sort of follow-up, which was ultimately the most important measure of this fellow's investment in his website.
I hope your article will spur a larger discussion of metrics and deliverables of web and social media for the little guy. At the end of the day, a company cannot demonstrate shareholder value through pageviews.
-- Mark
@markwschaefer
www.businessesGROW.com
John Bottom
Thanks for your comment, Mark. This is the heart of the problem. And in many ways the hallowed, best-practice principles of direct marketing and inbound marketing are incompatible.
One says gather data in order to provide what the prospect wants, the other says allow them to gravitate towards you as part of the new-share-everything approach of social media. But then, if we are honest, the data capture form is not to find out more about the prospect, but to get contact details and screen out time wasters. It is a pretty cynical process, but then again we are ultimately in the business of making sales.
If I had the answer I'd share it with everyone. As long as I got their data first, obviously.
Jamie Lee Wallace
John,
As a fan of David Meerman Scott's work in World Wide Rave, I completely support your recommendations.
Consumers - be they end-users or B2B buyers - are becoming savvier about who they engage with on the Web. I agree that using a registration form as the price of admission is an outdated concept that leaves a bad taste in the visitor's mouth. It creates a transactional relationship ... which is not what you should be going for.
Great piece. Love the simple-to-understand point of differentiation between Inbound and Outbound.
John Bottom
Thanks for your comment Jamie. It's amazing how opinion is polarising over this matter. I have a had a few responses via Twitter that almost scold me for my naivety, eg "How do you expect to run a business without knowing who my prospects are?" I have no answer to them apart from a firmly-held belief that there is a lot to be gained from free (and I mean free) sharing of information. There is still room for data gathering exercises but, in my opinion, not here. So it is reassuring to hear you come in on my side of the debate!
Thanks
John
Jamie Lee Wallace
John - It IS a raging debate, isn't it? ;)
I think there are still appropriate ways to collect prospect information, but firmly believe that it should be voluntary on the part of the prospect. For instance, I think it's fine to prominently display a registration field on your Web site or blog - INVITING (not requiring) visitors to register for more information or additional contact. Handling the presentation of that link in a conversational way completely changes the tone of the interaction in a positive way.
It's overstated these days, but even B2B marketing is based on relationships. It's important to treat prospects with respect - and that means not bribing them with content that should be freely given so that you can "capture" their personal information.
One last comment. Companies should also pay attention to the percentage of bogus emails submitted to their forms when considering real ROI. ;)
John Bottom
I think you're right that the tone is very important, as is offering the option of something extra in exchange for registration. And speaking of tone, the very phrase 'data capture' is pretty warlike. Terms like 'registration' and 'subscription' might be less inflammatory.
Thanks again for your input
John
Blake Hinckley
Hi John,
I appreciate the way you take a stand for free flowing information. There is simply too much content on the web for people to spend ten minutes filling out useless survey questions--however I do believe e-mail registration is crucial in order to track engagement and motivate the potential customer to return.
I think we can agree that surveys and endless data entry are dead and dying. The question then becomes how to gauge interest, save your sales team time and money, and provide the user with the most relevant, personalized content. The answer that I think Mark and others are looking for can be provided by Passive and Interactive Profiling. I have a couple posts describing the processes. "Learning B2B from the CIA: Passive Profiling: can be found at http://bit.ly/4Wxwy and "Interactive Profiling: Time to Hang Up Those Surveys Boys" can be found at http://bit.ly/44ntKB I would love your feedback.
Thanks for your time John.
Best,
Blake Hinckley
John Bottom
If it's good enough for the CIA, it's good enough for me. I will definitely have a look and comment on your site. Thanks for the suggestion, Blake
Bob Scheier
I'd put in an enthusiastic vote for what some call "passive tracking" and I cann "Track eyeballs, not forms" -- creating content aimed at attracting specific types of prospects, and tracking who reads/downloads what. You then have specific (if anonymous) information at the individual prospect level, and can decide when in the buying cycle you ask them to offer up their contact info. Would love to hear comments/feedback/criticism on this idea, explained further in white paper at
http://www.scheierassociates.com/leadgeninarecession/trackeyeballsnotforms.html.
And speaking of "spoiling the mood" having to register to comment on this blog did have the effect of turning on the lights ;)
Good topic, keep 'em coming...
Reply